[linux-6.6.y] update ITMT support patch for Zhaoxin CPUs #530
Conversation
|
Hi @leoliu-oc. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a deepin-community member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: opsiff The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This reverts commit e28f977. Signed-off-by: LeoLiu-oc <[email protected]>
The _CPC method can get per-core highest frequency. The highest frequency may varies between cores which mean cores can running at different max frequency, so can use it as a core priority and give a hint to scheduler in order to put critical task to the higher priority core. Signed-off-by: LeoLiu-oc <[email protected]>
Workaround for incorrect max frequency calculation on Zhaoxin/Centaur CPUs. Signed-off-by: LeoLiu-oc <[email protected]>
leoliu-oc
force-pushed
the
linux-6.6.y-92-cppc-update
branch
from
5f7681e to
b6fdee9
Compare
|
/lgtm |
This comment was marked as abuse.
This comment was marked as abuse.
Include 3 patches:
0001-Revert-cpufreq-ACPI-add-ITMT-support-when-CPPC-enabl.patch
0002-cpufreq-ACPI-add-ITMT-support-when-CPPC-enabled.patch
0003-cpufreq-acpi-cpufreq-Zhaoxin-fix-incorrect-max-freq-.patch
Roll back the previous old patch, update to the new patch version,
and fix the issue of mismatched max freq.